The following plots present the detailed performance of each method with respect to the estimation of the number of fiber populations in a voxel. The performances are reported both considering the raw estimated fiber directions, metrics , , , and also using a tolerancer cone, metrics , , .
The average scores are plotted as a function of the crossing angle, where the angle between the two fiber populations was increased from to .
To help the reader in highlighting differences and similarities among the algorithms, the scores are also summarized in three separate ranges of crossing angles: (downward triangles), (squares) and (upward triangles).