The following plots present the detailed performance of each method with respect to the estimation of the number of fiber populations in a voxel.
The performances are reported both considering the raw estimated fiber directions, metrics ,
,
, and also using a tolerancer cone, metrics
,
,
.
The average scores are plotted as a function of the crossing angle, where the angle between the two fiber populations was increased from to
.
To help the reader in highlighting differences and similarities among the algorithms, the scores are also summarized in three separate ranges of crossing angles: (downward triangles),
(squares) and
(upward triangles).